Is a Home Cooked Diet for Dogs a Good Idea?

by Jim McBean on March 12, 2010 · View Comments

Image Source: Bogart Handsome Devil

In the 1940′s Dr. Francis Pottenger M.D. conducted research using extracts of adrenal cortices removed from donated laboratory cats, for use in the treatment of human patients suffering from allergies and exhaustion. Cats cannot live without their adrenal glands, so by determining how much extract was required to keep a cat alive, drug manufacturers could determine how to fine-tune the potency of their adrenal hormone products for human use.

Pottenger became concerned when most of his cats died either during the removal of their adrenal glands, or shortly thereafter. Up to this point, all cats were being fed a seemingly healthy diet of raw milk, cod liver oil and cooked meat scraps, which included liver, tripe, sweetbreads (pancreas and/or thymus), brains, heart and muscle.

Note: I assume the cats were given life sustaining dosages of adrenal extract and that the mortality rate was due to other factors.

Soon Dr. Pottenger had more donated cats than he could supply with cooked meat scraps, so he began ordering meat scraps and offal from a local meat packing plant which he fed raw to a separate group of cats. Within a few months the raw fed group was in much better health than the group eating the cooked meat, which led to the study of how the nutrients in food are destroyed by heat. The study spanned 10 years and involved 900 cats.

The Meat Study

One group of cats was fed a diet of two-thirds raw meat, one-third raw milk, and cod-liver oil while the second group was fed a diet of two-thirds cooked meat, one-third raw milk, and cod-liver oil.

The following two quotes by Dr. Pottenger explain the health consequences between the two diets.

The Good

“The cats receiving raw meat and raw milk reproduced in homogeneity from one generation to the next. Abortion was uncommon and the mother cats nursed their young in a normal manner. The cats had good resistance to vermin, infections, and parasites. They behaved in a predictable manner. Their organic development was complete and functioned normally.”

The Not So Good

“Cats receiving the cooked-meat scraps reproduced a heterogeneous strain of kittens, each kitten of the litter being different in skeletal pattern. Abortion in these cats was common, running about 25 per cent in the first generation to about 70 per cent in the second generation. Deliveries were in general difficult, many cats dying in labor. Mortality rates of the kittens were high, frequently due to the failure of the mother to lactate. The kittens were often too frail to nurse.”

It took four generations for the ancestors of the cats fed cooked meat and pasteurized milk to recover to perfect health. You can read the whole of Dr. Pottenger’s work in his book, Pottenger’s Cats- A Study in Nutrition.

The Importance of Taurine in Feline Health

What vital elements were destroyed in the heat processing of the foods fed the cats? – Dr. Francis Pottenger

At the time Dr. Pottenger conducted his study, the amino acid taurine had been discovered, but had not yet been identified as “essential” for cats. Taurine is considered essential for cats and they must derive it from their diet because they cannot synthesize it.

In 2010 it is common knowledge that cooking destroys many important nutrients in food that are required for good health. It is also well known that the amino acid taurine (essential for cats) is one of those nutrients destroyed during food processing (cooking). Taurine is required for digestion, cardiac function, immune health, and eye functions. A deficiency in taurine can lead to a number of health problems in cats, including blindness, tooth decay and hair loss.

Hey, I Thought This Was a Dog Blog?

Go easy on me, cats and dog blogs can get along!

Cooking Kills

As I mentioned in the last paragraph, and as you probably already knew, cooking destroys many healthful nutrients found in raw foods. Whether you feed dry kibble, canned or home cooked food, it’s all cooked, reducing the potency of many of the nutrients, or completely destroying them altogether. Many of the nutrients that have been damaged by cooking are required by our pets (as well as us) to be healthy.

Cooking Destroys Vitamins

In order for vegetables to be digestible for dogs, they must be minced, juiced or cooked. Vitamin C is a very dainty compound. It oxidizes quickly when exposed to air or light, and cooking destroys about 75% of the vitamin C in food.

A number of the B vitamins are also destroyed by cooking including pantothenic acid (B5), folic acid and vitamin B12.

Enzymes are lost when food is heated above 118 degrees Fahrenheit (48 degrees Celsius)

Why does that matter?

Well, enzymes in raw food are responsible for at least two things;

  1. Aiding in the digestion of the foods they are found in.
  2. Helping to slow the aging process.

Cooked foods/kibble (with the exception of vegetables) are more difficult for our dogs to digest than raw foods. This means that the dog’s pancreas has to work double time to produce more digestive enzymes to break down the food. A life time of being forced to eat cooked foods can lead to pancreatitis and diabetes.

Sure, the pet food manufacturers throw in a few vitamins and minerals to make up for nutrients lost during processing, but these inclusions are almost always synthetic and not as well tolerated as natural source vitamins, minerals and amino acids.

Then there’s the guy in a white coat armed with the latest “scientific” research, doing his level best to try and duplicate the genius of Mother Nature, with the hopes adding “optimal” levels of these micro-nutrients back into the product.

Of course there are other potential drawbacks to cooking a dogs food such as;

The bottom line is – just as we know that for ourselves, fresh raw food is a more nutritious and healthy (in most cases), so is it too for our little carnivores.

  1. Veggies: A Place in the Raw Meaty Bones Diet For Dogs?
  2. Breeder: “Feed Your Dogs a Raw Diet and it Will Kill Them!”
  3. Why Mixing Kibble with Raw May Not Be a Good Idea
  • EdieJ

    I'm with you on not digesting the so-called science of the pet food industry whole, but I don't see the leap from the experiment with raw cat food to the notion that cooked food helps create diabetes in dogs. Yes, I'm sensitive on that topic, given that I have a diabetic dog, but if he was “meant” to eat raw food, I think he would have embraced the Stella & Chewy's freeze dried beef and chicken patties that I gave him for the last couple of months more enthusiastically. He liked them okay at first; now he won't go near them, even as treats. I trust my dog to let me know what his body needs, and he prefers my cooked meat (either low fat beef, chicken, or pork) on kibble combo to the freeze dried raw food.

  • michelechollow

    Cats and dogs do get along, and cats are true carnivores. I cringe when I hear vegetarians feed their cats a vegetarian or vegan diet. I don't eat meat, but my cat does. He needs it. I haven't tried raw food for him. Many cooked canned options have taurine in them.

  • http://doggybytes.ca Jim (Doggybytes.ca)

    Edie,

    First let me say that most of us (you and I included) really care about providing the best lives for our pets, and we try and provide them with the best nutrition that we can based on the knowledge we have.

    Dr. Pottenger's work sparked a whole new way of looking at nutrition and what happens to the foods we eat after we cook them. Since then much has been learned about the detrimental effects of heat on certain nutrients, as I mentioned in my post, and it is well known that many of the nutrients found in food are destroyed by heat and/or transformed into harmful substances. There is much research to back these claims up.

    Pottenger's work suggests negative implications for all animals (human included) where their diet consists mainly of cooked foods, due to the destruction of important nutrients, such as live enzymes in raw food being destroyed by the heating process of cooking.

    What does this mean for dogs? It means, as I mentioned above, that the digestive enzymes that would be present in raw food and would normally aid in digestion, are not present in cooked food, which forces the dog's pancreas to work harder to produce more enzymes to digest their food. A lifetime of this puts excessive strain on the organ which can lead to pancreatic problems.

    The other animal that eats a predominately cooked diet is us, and the prevalence of human diabetes in North America is off the charts.

    Pottenger travelled the globe visiting indigenous people's and found that those that were still eating their traditional diets had perfect health, no diabetes, no cancers and impeccable teeth. People's that had been introduced to the “western diet” were showing signs of all these maladies.

    Ian Billinghurst talks about the dangers of feeding a dog a cooked diet in his book Give Your Dog a Bone, saying that cooked food tastes better to dogs (not sure I agree with that) and that feeding cooked food could create picky eaters that will only eat cooked food.

    When I first got Zeus he wouldn't eat for three days when presented with raw food. Actually I don't think he knew what to do with it. After three days he was hungry enough to try it and we've never looked back. This morning I gave him a chicken back. I turned around for literally two minutes and it was gone!

    It's probably not a good thing for a diabetic dog not to eat for three days until he's hungry enough to eat raw food. If I were in the position of wanting to switch a diabetic dog from cooked food to raw food, I'd seek out a good holistic vet knowledgeable in switching diabetic dogs to a raw diet.

    For me, if it came down to feeding my dogs commercial kibble or canned food or home cooked food, I'd choose the home cooked food.

  • http://doggybytes.ca Jim (Doggybytes.ca)

    Michele,

    I think all cat foods have taurine added to them after processing, it is an AAFCO requirement.

    The point I was trying to make with this post is that many nutrients in foods (some we probably don't even know about) are destroyed by the heating process of cooking, which includes the processing of kibble and canned foods.

  • http://www.dancingdogblog.com Mary Haight

    Interesting trip back to the discovery of raw food benefits. And yes, if we all ate more raw vegetables…I won't go there for meat anymore…we would be healthier overall (for those without issues in this regard). I'm going to add a little of one of Stella & Chewy's dinner patties to Tashi's regular fare–he takes a long, slow intro to any new food–to add dimension to his home cooked fare. I'll have to figure out the balance of nutrition. I got a bag to review so we'll see.

  • http://doggybytes.ca Jim (Doggybytes.ca)

    Just remember that part of “balance” means including bone. Something like size appropriate i.e. chicken wing for a small dog, turkey wing for a big dog, that kind of thing.

    I had a salad today. haha

  • http://www.dancingdogblog.com Mary Haight

    Frankly, I worry about choking. I know it's not necessarily ideal, but his nylabone will have to do for his teeth and supplements to replace what he's missing from bones. Unless I become less of a nervous dog mom…no canines, never had a real bone before, little dog….awk!

  • EdieJ

    As it happens, I did research into and a story about a Native American group here in southern Arizona, whose incidence of diabetes was more than 50% because of their diets. And when they returned to native foods such as cholla buds and tepary beans they were able to improve those numbers dramatically. Exercise helped a great deal too.

    BUT — all those foods have to be cooked. A lot. I tried giving Frankie tepary beans — which are very high in protein and fiber — along with meat and vegetables and had to slow cook them in a crock pot for hours in order to make them edible.

    And, more to the point, I have since discovered that dogs have what is akin to type 1 diabetes in humans. There is nothing they can eat to reverse the condition. It is not diet related but hereditary. That's not the case with cats, whose diabetes can be reversed by diet in many cases.

    One final clarification: Frankie ate Stella and Chewys patties enthusiastically at first. Then he went off them. So it wasn't a question of introducing a new diet to him (which it's important to do gradually). It was a question of rejecting the food after he had been eating it for a while.

    I know we are working towards the same goal, the health of our dogs. But where we differ is my belief that there is no one true path to achieve that goal.

  • http://www.gopetfriendlyblog.com/2010/03/fetching-news-week-ending-03-12-2010/ Fetching News – Week Ending 03.12.2010

    [...] week, the blog covered why your dog may eat poop (not as uncommon as you might think) and whether home cooked meals are right for your [...]

  • http://www.GoPetFriendly.com/ Rod@GoPetFriendly

    Once again – great original content that falls into your blog's manifesto of canine health and nutrition. I have seen numerous studies recommending that human eat food as close to its original natural state as possible. I am not surprised that studies would support the same findings for our pets.

  • http://www.GoPetFriendly.com/ Rod@GoPetFriendly

    I so agree. A couple of weeks ago, we bought raw chicken wings for our dogs. I heard minimal bone chewing – just gulping. I held my breath and immediately started thinking that I would never forgive myself if they choked on the bones. Well, they didn't. And both dogs thought it was the greatest “treat” they ever got. I won't do chicken again, but we are going to try turkey.

  • http://doggybytes.ca Jim (Doggybytes.ca)

    Yeah, chicken wings are too small for your boys, turkey wings or legs are a good size for them, but still supervise the guys. =)

  • http://doggybytes.ca Jim (Doggybytes.ca)

    Thanks Rod.

    Barring any genetic ailment or otherwise that might preclude an animal from being able to eat it's food in the “most natural state”, which is raw, (humans are the only animal to cook its food), I really don't understand the opposition to feeding raw, or the mindset that kibble or canned food is a more healthy choice. That line of thinking truly boggles the mind.

    I was watching an interview of an anti-raw Australian vet, probably shot in the '90's. The interviewer asked the vet why he didn't think feeding raw was a good idea, the vet replied, “well, it isn't natural”. :/

  • http://doggybytes.ca Jim (Doggybytes.ca)

    I'll be the first to admit I don't know much about canine diabetes. If it is a genetic thing, it makes me wonder if the root cause is breeding.

    As for palatability of foods, there can be many reasons that a dog is or can become a picky eater. In my experience having fed raw to three dogs – I haven't found one food they didn't like. The first time I offered fresh thawed trout to Zeus he wasn't into it, but when I offered it frozen, he was all over it. A fish popsicle, who woulda thunk it? :/

  • http://www.vonlobos.com/ Robert

    Great article Jim.

    When Lobo was in his last year we did everything we could to get him to eat at times. Many days he just wasn't interested and he lost a lot of weight. We gave some raw and then he didn't want that so we cooked it and he ate it. Sometimes it was kibble, sometimes it was rice and beef with beef fat. We did have to supplement with vitamins to make sure he was getting all he needed. Most days he at kibble with bacon fat on top without issues. I think he lost his sense of smell mostly and if it didn't smell good enough for him he wouldn't touch it.

    My sister's dog lived to be a little over 18 years old (we are guessing by the age when he was adopted) and come to find out he had liver cancer. He ate what he could – white castle burgers, Orijen kibble, canned food, fish sandwiches, hotdogs…whatever they could get him to eat. And it was so hard for him to keep food down. You had to be real patient with him. Amazingly I got Orijen in him for a whole week w/out any issue by hand feeding him. When I left they said he got picky again. I don't know if they just didn't take the time I did to hand feed him in a quite place. In the end, it would not have mattered much since he had cancer.

    I do have a question though – it is just the enzymes that are destroyed or what about the amino acids, proteins, etc? The reason I ask is us humans can eat cooked food and it seems we are not suffering from malnutrition nor do we need a vitamin supplement each day as long as we are eating a balanced diet.

    Great article as always!

  • http://doggybytes.ca Jim (Doggybytes.ca)

    Good question Rob.

    Heating (cooking) food can and does damage or destroy many nutrients, depending on the level of heat being used to cook the foods and how tolerant a particular nutrient (enzymes, vitamins, minerals, proteins etc). I'm not an expert in this, but it is well known that nutrients are destroyed by cooking.

    If you take a look at all of the maladies that affect North Americans these days, there is a correlation (I think) between the fewer raw (unprocessed) foods we now eat, as compared to 100 years ago, and poor health. Heart disease, obesity, cancer, diabetes, thyroid problems, acid refulx etc etc, are rampant. We're not eating less, but we're eating less “natural foods” than we did in the past, the majority of those foods bein cooked foods.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not about to go vegan or anything, but I'm really starting to think that the switch away from more raw natural foods to less natural cooked and processed foods is likely one of the biggest contributors to the declining health of North Americans – and our pets. Sure we live longer and so do our pets. Our nutrition is killing us, but the medical advances made in the last 100 years offset that, in my opinion.

    As for whether we're malnourished. You can gorge yourself every day and still be malnourished. Celiac Disease which my mother has, is an example of that.

  • http://www.dancingdogblog.com Mary Haight

    I agree, Edie, there is no one way – dogs are distinctly individual and come with their own set of needs. What they refuse, especially with a dog who is ill, should be honored as long as that refusal won't bring harm. And I think everyone here is open to learning and doing the best that we can.

  • http://www.dancingdogblog.com Mary Haight

    Oooo, there is *nothing* worse than that moment of holding your breath wondering if the object is going to stick in a place where you can fish it out, or if the heimlich maneuver will be called for…I can almost feel the cold sweat of fear in what you said!

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post:

Get Smart with the Thesis Theme from DIY Themes!

Doggy Bytes on Twitter Doggy Bytes on Facebook My Dog Rocks Bookmark this Doggy Bytes RSS Feed Jim's Email